The Open Problems
Chapter 4 Β· Navlakha et al. 2008 Β· Seely 2025
R-D bounds for journey observables. Checkpoint spacing via sheaf cohomology.
Problem 1: Rate-distortion bounds for journey observables
The question: Given a bit budget R, what is the minimum distortion in journey metrics (reachability, duration, hop count) for a temporal graph?
What exists: Navlakha et al. (2008) proposed MDL-based graph summarization with bounded per-node reconstruction error for static graphs. This is MDL, not Shannon rate-distortion theory β no R-D tradeoff curve, no converse bounds. Adhikari et al. (2017) and Allen et al. (2024) compress temporal networks preserving dynamics heuristically. None provides information-theoretic bounds where distortion is measured on temporal journeys.
What it requires:
- A concrete encoding family β how temporal graphs are represented in bits
- A concrete distortion functional D(G, Δ) on journey observables
- A concrete temporal-graph model (e.g., temporal ErdΕsβRΓ©nyi)
- A definition of admissible decoders
Problem 2: Checkpoint spacing via sheaf cohomology
The question: On a directed dependency graph with per-edge prediction error, when are checkpoints necessary, and how should they be spaced?
The sheaf formulation: Seely (2025) shows that on a cellular sheaf, the coboundary Ξ΄β° produces edgewise prediction errors and the Hodge decomposition splits them into two components:
- Image part (in im D) β eliminable by better activations / encoder choices
- Harmonic part (in ker Dα΅ = HΒΉ) β not eliminable by any activation assignment
The scalar additive error law Ξ΅(eβ) β ... β Ξ΅(eβ) may be the wrong abstraction. The right quantity could be the harmonic component of accumulated error β the part that no encoder choice can remove. Checkpoints would then correspond to clamped boundary conditions on a subgraph that suppress or localize the harmonic component.
Seely's framework gives exact definitions for every term. The open question is whether checkpoint placement can be formulated as a constraint on a relative coboundary problem, and whether spacing bounds follow from the cohomological structure.
The linear restriction aligns with codec prediction (motion-compensated subtraction is linear). Nonlinear extension requires Jacobian linearization.
Toy model: empirical compression curve
Compress a temporal graph by dropping edges, measure journey distortion. This is greedy edge-dropping, not a Shannon R-D bound β but the shape of the curve is informative:
What the toy model shows
Diminishing returns as you add edges, and a critical threshold below which reachability collapses. The open problem asks for the information-theoretic minimum: for a class of temporal graphs, how close can any compression get to the frontier?
Temporal Compression
(blog post)
Neighbors
Key references
- Seely 2025 β sheaf cohomology of predictive coding
- Navlakha et al. 2008 β MDL graph compression
- Krishnan 2014 β sheaf-theoretic MFMC
- Temporal state machines β tropical invariance
Related sections
- π‘ Information Theory β rate-distortion foundations
- π± Category Theory β composition, functors